Posted on 26. March 2010 15:13 by qrobbsilbert
In areas within the country that witnessed double digit declines in home values, home owners have been struggling with whether to continue making their monthly payments or walk away from their homes. Coupled with the fact that efforts towards modifying loans has led mostly towards rate and term adjustments and it's easy to see why homeowners are so frustrated. Most homeowners we speak with that are in this type of situation understand that a rate and term adjustment, when the home is still upside down by double digits, is simply a temporary stay of execution and that they will be forced to short-sale their home at some time in the future. The question is, should lenders be forced to consider principal reduction modifications? Without them, are they not setting up their investors for failure? In other words, if they get the loan performing once again and turn around and sell the loan as a performing loan, only to have the borrower short-sale the property in the future, are they not misrepresenting the situation to their shareholders? Please reply with your thought and comments?